Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 01.07.2025 12:54
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Let’s just make it real clear:
Xiaomi confirms imminent launch of new flagship phones and tablets - Notebookcheck
Just in the last 5 years:
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
Microsoft's OpenAI partnership is fraying at the seams - Axios
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
This nonhormonal hot-flash remedy gives options to women, experts say - The Washington Post
Thank you.
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
BYD sells 382,476 NEVs in May, overseas sales hit new high - CnEVPost
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
Is it true that all men want a woman who looks like an Instagram “model”?
What’s next?
Russia can stop this any time.
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
Why do you think it is bad to allow people to self-identify as a different gender?
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
Which Red Sox prospect will be next to draw Roman Anthony-level excitement? - MassLive